Comment on Yuan Et Al
نویسندگان
چکیده
It has come to our attention that the work of Yuan et al. [1] is being represented as definitive regarding the existence of a particular nonstrange, isoscalar, spin three dibaryon, d * , which we [2] , among others [3, 4, 5, 6, 8] , have proposed exists. We therefore wish to comment on this paper and its relation to ours and those of others. In our work [2] , the d * dibaryon is constructed in terms of its constituent quark wavefunctions, which include significant distortion from those found in isolated baryons. It should be noted that these wavefunctions do not collapse into a simple, spherical system as proposed, for example, by Jaffe [9] for the H dibaryon. Our techniques have allowed us to demonstrate that this picture adequately reproduces known low energy baryon-baryon scattering amplitudes with only one or two fitting parameters. At the other extreme are theories of baryon interactions without any quark sub-structure whatsoever. These also, in terms of effective potentials or meson exchanges, adequately reproduce known low energy baryon-baryon scattering amplitudes, albeit with a multitude of fitting parameters. Such approaches tend not to predict deeply bound dibaryons, with the exception of Ref.[6]. Rather, the states examined are generally found to have a character not very dissimilar from the deuteron, with small binding energies predicted [10] , if any. Approaches such as that of Yuan et al. [1] and similarly those of Thomas et al. or Wilets et al. [7] take an intermediate view, including quark substructure of distinct baryons, but variously restricting interactions between quarks as due to exchanges of mesons or other collective fields, exchanges of gluons, or both. Some change of internal baryon structure is allowed in these models. Interestingly, the approaches that include or are restricted to only meson exchanges may be characterized as generally predicting dibaryon states with binding energies intermediate between the two approaches referred to above. They also can well describe low energy baryon-baryon scattering amplitudes or nuclei, albeit again with a significant number of parameters which must be fit to data.
منابع مشابه
Some Notes on Critical Appraisal of Prevalence Studies; Comment on: “The Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Use in Systematic Reviews Addressing Questions of Prevalence”
Decisions in healthcare should be based on information obtained according to the principles of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM). An increasing number of systematic reviews are published which summarize the results of prevalence studies. Interpretation of the results of these reviews should be accompanied by an appraisal of the methodological quality of the included data and studies. The critical a...
متن کاملHow Can a Global Social Support System Hope to Achieve Fairer Competiveness?; Comment on “A Global Social Support System: What the International Community Could Learn From the United States’ National Basketball Association”
Ooms et al sets out some good general principles for a global social support system to improve fairer global competitiveness as a result of redistribution. This commentary sets out to summarize some of the conditions that would need to be satisfied for it to level up gradients in inequality through such a social support system, using the National Basketball Association (NBA) example as a point ...
متن کاملModeling in Early Stages of Technology Development: Is an Iterative Approach Needed?; Comment on “Problems and Promises of Health Technologies: The Role of Early Health Economic Modeling”
A recent paper by Grutters et al makes the case for early health economic modeling in the development of health technologies. A number of examples of the value of early modeling are given, with analyses being performed at different stages in the development of several non-drug health technologies. This commentary acknowledges the contribution of the paper by Grutters et...
متن کاملThe Co-Constitution of Health Systems and Innovation; Comment on “What Health System Challenges Should Responsible Innovation in Health Address? Insights From an International Scoping Review”
Lehoux et al provide a timely and relevant turn on the broad and ongoing discussion around the introduction of health technology and innovation. More specifically, the authors suggest a demand-driven approach to health innovation that starts from identifying challenges and demands at the health system level. In this commentary, I review a number of underlying implications of their study in rela...
متن کاملPolicy Capacity in the Learning Healthcare System; Comment on “Health Reform Requires Policy Capacity”
Pierre-Gerlier Forest and his colleagues make a strong argument for the need to expand policy capacity among healthcare actors. In this commentary, I develop an additional argument in support of Forest et al view. Forest et al rightly point to the need to have embedded policy experts to successfully translate healthcare reform policy into healthcare change. Translation of externally generated i...
متن کاملGlobal health diplomacy: a ‘Deus ex Machina’ for international development and relations; Comment on “A Ghost in the Machine? Politics in Global Health Policy”
Brugha and Bruen (2014) raise a number of compelling issues related to the interaction between politics and policy in the global health context. The first question that their views invite is whether this is, at heart, best characterized as a benign or malign influence. Many commentators have suggested that this overlap should be discouraged (see, for example, Marseille et al 2002; Thomas & Webe...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2000